pride & prejudisco

From the UK’s “That Mitchell & Webb Look”

Posted in comedy | Comments Off

old masters & ‘cameras’


“I’m ready for my close-up, Mister Vermeer…” (the girl in the red hat, 1665).

Here’s a documentary that’s well worth your time. You’ll never look at an Old Master painting in the same way again – but in a good way, promise.

Back around 2001 (probably overlooked by many due to certain unpleasant events that occurred that year) David Hockney revealed his thesis that the Old Masters used lenses and mirrors as primitive ‘cameras’, allowing phenomenal leaps of realism in their art. They projected their subjects onto canvases, and painted over the image.

It’s not exactly a secret <snark>to those who go to the trouble of reading books</snark> that painters of the 1600s like Vermeer used the Camera Obscura to assist them with complex perspective scenes. The Hockney thesis pushes the use back to the early 1400s – and the evidence of lenses and concave mirrors is pretty good – as in, it’s in the paintings, goode syr – as in Van Eyck’s c1434 ‘van der Paele altarpiece’:

Yeah yeah, but they didn’t have fancy curved mirrors so shut up you…

Well, it’s probably not very clear and crude and….

Mother of…

The original documentary is on youtube. The image quality isn’t great, but it’s watchable. Those who prefer a higher quality version can download it from the usual sources.

There are 8 parts. You WILL watch them all.

Of course, there was a backlash to the theory from poorly educated nitwits. These people took the thesis as an attack on the painters of the Renaissance. Clearly they know not a lot about the skill required to convert a tracing of a blurry projection into a coherent work of art. It’s only a tool, and not a crutch. Having built a couple of primitive camera obscura, the idea that it’s a magic bullet, or a crutch is laughable.

As Hockney has been forced to point out – the projections don’t make marks, the artist does. There are great photographers, and crappy ones. Cameras don’t make artists. 

File under: blindingly obvious.

Hockney’s demonstration of the work process for a Caravaggio only increases respect for that man. Working within the constraints of the primitive technology must have been a headache. It’s amazing to see how the scenes were built though – they seem more like the work of modern cinematographers – who were themselves some of the great visual artists of the 20th century.

Here’s Hockney’s partner in thought-crime, Charles M. Falco, professor, College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona. He gives a really great talk about the optics behind some of the pictures. Five parts. Watch them and weep.

Posted in art, history, mindfuck | 1 Comment

the large turf

“The Large Turf”, by Albrecht Durer (1503):

detail:

Posted in art, occult | Comments Off

(s)election 2010

The joys of unfamiliar history! Silbury Hill:

Dmitri Orlov: Survey of Unlikely Voters

There are those who call themselves conservatives, and who are in fact not conservatives at all but free market liberals. There are those who call themselves libertarians, but who have somehow forgotten their anarchist-socialist roots and are in fact also free market liberals. Then there are the “liberals,” who are also free market liberals but aspire to being nice, whereas the rest of the free market liberals are nasty … these distinctions don’t actually matter—because no matter what these politicians call themselves they are all state-capitalists who have been exhibiting quite a few fascist tendencies of late…

…US voters are easy marks for political tricksters, and it is probably something that just can’t be helped. The neatest trick is getting them to vote against their class interest. A few generations ago we had the “Reagan democrats”: working class people who voted—not once but twice!—for someone who was anti-union and generally anti-labor. And now, a few decades of political progress later, we have the “Teabaggers”: middle-aged obese and sickly white people who are about to cast their vote for someone who will take away their government-provided electrifc scooters and their very expensive medical care. When the political tricksters fail and the voting public actually gets a little bit upset, it is time to send in the clowns, and so most recently a couple of late-night TV comedians have joined the fray, holding a massive rally to “restore sanity.” This new sanity is epitomized by the following family portrait: daddy is a “Conservative Republican” mommy is an “Obama Liberal,” the son is a “Libertarian,” the daughter is a “Green,” and the dog (the only one of them who is sane) is trying to run away.

The first two minutes of music on this clip are really pretty – in a sparse, ethereal way:

Automatic Earth: Obama’s wearing Herbert Hoover’s concrete booties

(Collapse) could unfold very, very quickly. Because deflation is a swing of poverty feedback, it can take awhile to build up. If you try to explain to people what’s coming, because it doesn’t happen instantly, they tend to go back to sleep. The thing they need to understand, however, is that when it does hit a tipping point, a kind of critical mass, then it can unfold exceptionally quickly. Then it’s very much like having the rug pulled out from under your feet. So I tell people all the time, prepare now because it’s better to be two years too early than five minutes too late. You can’t play with this sort of thing. In September, 2008, we came within a few hours of the banking system seizing up, and that could easily happen again. People wouldn’t get a lot of notice. For anyone who’s not in the meeting room-it will be too late by the time they find out. My worry is that if there are an enormous number of people who just had the rug pulled out from under their feet, they’re going to run around like headless chickens, and the human over-reaction to events will be really responsible for a large percentage of the impact.

Posted in collapse, history, music | Comments Off

codex seraphinianus

The Voynich Manuscript is one of the oddest objects from history. Written around the 15th or 16th century, it’s a book that seems to be an encyclopedia from another world, written in a script that appears to be real. It has confounded minds for many years. The work of a madman? A book from another world? A coded Alchemical cookbook? In any case, the book has consumed the attention of countless hours of study by some pretty smart people:

Over its recorded existence, the Voynich manuscript has been the object of intense study by many professional and amateur cryptographers, including some top American and British codebreakers of World War II fame (all of whom failed to decipher a single word). This string of failures has turned the Voynich manuscript into a famous subject of historical cryptology, but it has also given weight to the theory that the book is simply an elaborate hoax – a meaningless sequence of arbitrary symbols.

In the 1970s, Italian artist Luigi Serafini created the ‘Codex Seraphinianus’, a similar work:

The Codex Seraphinianus was written and illustrated by Italian graphic designer and architect, Luigi Serafini during the late 1970′s. The Codex is a lavishly produced book that purports to be an encyclopedia for an imaginary world in a parallel universe, with copious comments in an incomprehensible language. It is written in a florid script, entirely invented and completely illegible, and illustrated with watercolor paintings. The Codex is divided into a number of sections (each with its own table of contents, the page numbers are in base-21 or base-22!) on subjects such as plants, animals, inhabitants, machines, clothing, architecture, numbers, cards, chemical analyses, labyrinth, Babel, foods… There are panoramic scenes of incomprehensible festivals, and diagrams of plumbing!

The Codex is to that imaginary world what Diderot’s Encyclopedia is to ours. Obviously, Serafini was not just attempting to create a consistent alternate world. Rather, the Codex is sort of an elaborate parody of the real world.

The invented script of the book imitates the Western-style writing systems (left-to-right writing in rows; an alphabet with uppercase and lowercase; probably a separate set of symbols for writing numerals) but is much more curvilinear reminding some Semitic scripts. The writing seems to have been designed to appear, but not actually be, meaningful, like the Voynich Manuscript.
At is best, the Codex Seraphinianus is really diverting and surrealist; at its worst, it is tedious, kitsch, and childish. This book was surely inspired by the Voynich Manuscript and designed with the spirit of Hieronymus Bosch in mind.

It’s a surreal wonderland. Here are some plant images:

Some of the strange inhabitants of the codex:

What the…

And places:

Here’s another introduction to the Codex Seraphinianus.

The entire book is viewable here.

Posted in art, ideas, mysteries, occult | Comments Off

saturn: it’s all gravy.

Two-mile high mountains of ice … on Saturn’s rings!

If you want a sign of how a narcissistic culture responds to this triumph of the (apparently decaying) Enlightenment, look no further than the comments on the preceding link. This one is a gem:

I guess I’m more interested in the practical application of scientific discovery than the discovery itself. Great that this can inform our understanding the shape of distant galaxies, but what does that mean for me today?

Take a wild guess: another participant of the “Rally to Restore SVanity” rally?

What about me? How do Saturn’s rings make MY life a better, more comfortable one? How does saving a rainforest help ME? What about MY life? I need a better cel-phone, and I don’t care how much Coltan has to be mined to get it. ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME!

?

Still, those ice-mountains are stunning…even if they can’t yet be melted, purified, and sold in plastic bottles.

Patience, young friend. Soon, we’ll be shitting the entire galaxy out of our puckered sphincters, once the propeller heads figure out Ion Drives.

PLANETARY MOTTO: “IT’S ALL GRAVY”.

Posted in space | 1 Comment

lego stewie

Lego science advances in leaps and bounds…

Posted in lego | Comments Off

daily show rally

Laurel wreaths and triumphant marches to Mark Ames for a clinical analysis of the gen-xy “Daily Show” rally. Note to the xy gang: post modern irony won’ t do squat. The banksters are laughing at you, well, all the way to the bank.

A century-old ideological movement, Liberalism: once devoted to impossible causes like ending racism and inequality, empowering the powerless, fighting against militarism, and all that silly hippie shit—now it’s been reduced to besting the other side at one-liners…and to the Liberals’ credit, they’re clearly on top. Sure there are a lot of problems out there, a lot of pressing needs—but the main thing is, the Liberals don’t look nearly as stupid as the other guys do. And if you don’t know how important that is to this generation, then you won’t understand what’s so wrong and so deeply depressing about the Jon Stewart Rally to Restore Sanity.

That’s what makes this rally so depressing and grotesque: It’s an anti-rally, a kind of mass concession speech without the speech–some kind of sick funeral party for Liberalism, in which Liberals are led, at last, by a clown. Not a figurative clown, but by a clown–and Liberals are sure that this somehow makes them smarter and less lame–and indeed, they are less lame, because they are not taking themselves too seriously, which is something they’re very, very proud of. All great political struggles and ideological advances, all great human rights achievements were won by clown-led crowds of people who don’t take themselves too seriously, duh! That’s why they’re following a clown like Stewart, whose entire political program comes down to this: not being stupid, the way the other guys are stupid–or when being stupid, only stupid in a self-consciously stupid way, which is to say, not stupid. That’s it, that’s all this is about: Not to protest wars or oligarchical theft or declining health care or crushing debt or a corrupt political system or imperial decay—nope, the only thing that motivates Liberals to gather in the their thousands is the chance to celebrate their own lack of stupidity! Woo-hoo!

It’s the final humiliating undoing of Enlightenment Idealism that made Liberalism possible–imagine if Jefferson, Diderot, Montesquieu, Madison et al reduced the entire Enlightenment’s struggle against the old feudal order to “I’m against the monarchy because the monarchy’s stupid…but then again, Rousseau makes a fool of himself with his Romanticism, and Tom Paine is so serious with his ‘Rights of Man’, the Revolutionaries are just as crazy as the Monarchists, so rather than join either side and risk opening myself to mockery, I’m just going to stand back and laugh at them all and say, ‘Really? Independence? Everyone is created equal and has the right to pursue happiness? Really, TJ? You sure you want to say that about Bluebeard? Really?” [LAUGH TRACK]…

Mark spends a good few paragraphs carving up Tom Hanks’ hapless daughter, then schools the idiot hellspawn of the Reagan “Revolution”:

Meanwhile, behind Door Number 1, the country is in two losing wars and the worst economic crisis in 80 years, behind Door Number 2, over 40 million Americans are on fucking food stamps, behind Door Number 3, millions are being land-transfered out of their property like landless peasants in a banana republic–yeah, it’s bad, whatever dude, it’s always been bad, nothing ever changes much, don’t have a cow, deal with it…

I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say a few things that might sound stupid, but bear with me:

1. Collective action is the only possible way to change shit. Large numbers of collectivized nobodies rallying to demand what they want–a better cut of the pie, and a better world to live in. It’s the only thing that power-elites fear and the only way to get them to negotiate. There must be thousands of billionaires’ unions—whether the Chamber of Commerce or the gazillions of libertarian networks—and the only thing they hope and dream about and invest their effort into is planting a seed into your vain Gen-X brain that makes you think it’s lame to collectivize. That’s it, that’s the only thing they care about while they’re plundering away. You’ll have to stomach being around people who are lame, and who say lame things, and you’ll feel lame—so you’ll have to decide which is lamer: the fear of being lame, or forming an alliance with people lamer than you in order to struggle against people far meaner, far more greedy and destructive than the lame people you hate—people who have no qualms about being lame when they collectivize, so long as they destroy you and grab everything they want. Tough choice, I know.

2. The problem with the Left wasn’t that they were too fixated on proving they were right, or that they didn’t make enough noise before the war about the lies that led us into that war…the problem is that the Left doesn’t stand for anything Big because it’s not guided by a vision or an Ideal. What does the Left stand for? Let me suggest a few things in people’s own personal interests in these decaying times that the Left should stand for: first, people need money. Then if they have money, they need Life. Then they might be interested in “ideals” set out in the contract that this country is founded on. Ever read the preamble to the Constitution? There’s nothing about private property there and self-interest. Nothing at all about that. It’s a contract whose purpose is clearly spelled out, and it’s a purpose that’s the very opposite of the purpose driving Stewart’s rally, or the purpose driving the libertarian ideology so dominant over the past few generations. This country, by contract, was founded in order to strive for a “more Perfect Union”—that’s “union,” as in the pairing of the words “perfect” and “union”—not sovereign, not states, not local, not selfish, but “union.” And that other purpose at the end of the Constitution’s contractual obligations: promote the “General Welfare.” That means “welfare.” Not “everyone for himself” but “General Welfare.” That’s what it is to be American: to strive to form the most perfect union with each other, and to promote everyone’s general betterment. That’s it. The definition of an American patriot is anyone promoting the General Welfare of every single American, and anyone helping to form the most perfect Union—that’s “union”, repeat, “Union” you dumb fucks. Now, our problem is that there are a lot of people in this country who have dedicated their entire lives to subverting the stated purpose of this country. We must be prepared to identify those who disrupt and sabotage our national purpose of creating this “more perfect union” identifying those who sabotage our national goal of “promoting the General Welfare”—and calling them by their name: traitors. You who strive to form this Perfect Union and promote General Welfare—You are Patriots.

3. Anytime anyone says anything libertarian, spit on them. Libertarians are by definition enemies of the state: they are against promoting American citizens’ general welfare and against policies that create a perfect union. Like Communists before them, they are actively subverting the Constitution and the American Dream, and replacing it with a Kleptocratic Nightmare.

4. A slogan, a line from Blade Runner: “Then we’re stupid, and we’ll die.”

Posted in economy, ideas | 5 Comments

titanic, nomadic!

Via Neatorama, an amusing prequel to “The Birds”. Even funnier if you’ve synchronistically watched the original the previous evening.

A cool fact was revealed while listening to a radio show from Belfast yesterday: a companion ship to the “Titanic” still survives. The “Nomadic” was 1/4 the length of old unsinkable, and was used to ferry first and second class passengers to the larger ship. For years, she’s sat on the Seine in Paris, a floating restaurant. Reduced to a sorry state, she’s been returned to Belfast, where restoration to her former glory is in progress.

With her sister ship SS Traffic, Nomadic was used as a tender for Titanic and Olympic at Cherbourg in France. Nomadic was fitted with a luxurious interior and was hence used for the first and second class passengers, while Traffic served the third class travellers.

During World War I Nomadic saw service in carrying American troops at Brest (France).

In 1927, she was sold to the Compagnie Cherbourgeoise de Transbordement and then sold again to the Société Cherbourgeoise de Remorquage et de Sauvetage in 1934. Then under the name Ingenieur Minard, she again served as a troop ship in World War II.

After the war she continued tendering Cunard White Star (the two companies merged in 1934) ships until November 1968. She then served RMS Queen Elizabeth for the last time.

In 1974, Nomadic was bought by a private individual and converted into a restaurant on the Seine in Paris, where she remained docked and semi-derelict after the closure of the restaurant, until she was moved to the port of Le Havre in 2006.

More photos here.

Posted in cinema, history | Comments Off

earth’s ‘second moon’

It’s November soon! Cruithne is coming!

3753 Cruithne ( /ˈkrɪnjə/, from Old Irish [ˈkrɪθnɛ]; Modern [ˈkrɪhnʲə] or [ˈkrɪnʲə]) is an asteroid in orbit around the Sun in 1:1 orbital resonance with that of the Earth. It is a periodic inclusion planetoid orbiting the Sun in an apparent horseshoe orbit.[2] It has been incorrectly called “Earth’s second moon”, but it is only a quasi-satellite.

There are several of these nifty little objects, trapped (for a while) in orbital resonances with Earth.

An interesting wiki page on imagined second moons of Earth, most from the Golden Age of hypothetical planets and other astral phantasmagoria (aka “the 19th Century):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_moons_of_Earth

And another dedicated to the planet Vulcan, believed by some to orbit between Mercury and the Sun:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulcan_(hypothetical_planet)

Lescarbault described in detail how, on 26 March 1859, he noticed a small black dot on the face of the Sun, which he was studying with his modest 3.75 inches (95 mm) refractor. Thinking it to be a sunspot, Lescarbault was not at first surprised, but after some time had passed he realized that it was moving. Having observed the transit of Mercury in 1845, he guessed that what he was observing was another transit, but of a previously undiscovered body. He took some hasty measurements of its position and direction of motion, and using an old clock and a pendulum with which he took his patients’ pulses, he estimated the duration of the transit at 1 hour, 17 minutes and 9 seconds.

Le Verrier thought he was satisfied that Lescarbault had seen the transit of a previously unknown planet. On 2 January 1860 he announced the discovery of Vulcan to a meeting of the Académie des Sciences in Paris. Lescarbault, for his part, was awarded the Légion d’honneur and invited to appear before numerous learned societies.

A more modern example of an imaginary planet (and possibly one the most embarrassing) is more recent, from 1991:

Andrew Lyne and Matthew Bailes thought that they had made a remarkable discovery in 1991, when they reported that they had discovered a pulsar orbited by a planetary companion;[1] this would have been the first planet detected around another star. However, after this was announced, the group went back and checked their work, and found that they had not properly removed the effects of the Earth’s motion around the Sun from their analysis, and, when the calculations were redone correctly, the pulse variations that led to their conclusions disappeared, and that there was in fact no planet around PSR 1829-10. When Lyne announced the retraction of his results at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society, he received a standing ovation from his scientific colleagues for having the intellectual integrity and the courage to admit this error publicly.

Lyne had discovered a planet, of course. It was the one he was standing on. Happy ending: he found a real extra-solar planet in 2003.

Posted in space | Comments Off

364 pick-up


Several months ago, reading one of Robert Anton Wilson’s “Cosmic Trigger” books, an interesting fact was revealed: the standard playing card deck contains 4 suits and 52 cards (not counting Jokers, yet).

4 seasons, 52 weeks. Coincidence?

It’s the kind of thing that might slip from one’s mind, or ferment. A few days later, a thought occurred: what would happen if one were to add up the value of each card in deck, all 52?

The Ace=1, The Numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. The Court Cards: The Jack (11), Queen (12) and King (13). One suit = 91

Four suits =364. Hmm.

The total value of all the cards is one shy of a solar year. But, remember: two Jokers. So that’s why they’re there, perhaps. This lead to a search of websites that cover the same topic. Prepare for bogglement & plurability:

http://hilgemeier.gmxhome.de/calendrix/cardmath.htm

A typical card deck has 52 cards – like the 52 weeks of the year. In the four symbol groups we may, with some right, recognize the four seasons (spring = Hearts, summer = Clubs, autumn = Spades, winter = Diamonds). Or order the classic four elements to the warm (red) and cold (black) seasons (fire = Hearts = spring, air = Diamonds = summer, water = Clubs = fall, earth = Spades = winter).

Fifty-two weeks times seven make 364 days – a year. Add the Joker and we get even closer to the solar year of about 365.25 days. The cipher sum of 364 is 3+6+4 = 13, the number of moon phases in a year, just like number of cards in each suit (4 * 13 = 52).

Now add the values of the cards, ace = 1, two = 2, three = 3, …, nine = 9, ten = 10, Jack = 11, Queen = 12, King = 13. Surprise: the sum is 364 = 4 * ( (13) * (13+1) / 2 ) = 4 * 91.

It goes on: Divide the number of values of a single suit (91) by the holy number seven and we get 13 again! The cipher sum of the 52 cards is also 5 + 2 = 7.

To get even more astonished, now count the letters of the names of each card

English:Ace(3), Two(3), Three(5), Four(4), Five(4), Six(3), Seven(5), Eight(5), Nine(4), Ten(3), Jack(4), Queen(5), King(4).
There are 52 cards and the letter sum of one suit is
3 + 3 + 5 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 5 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 4 = 52.

This also holds for French: As(2), Deux(4), Trois(5), Quatre(6), Cinq(4), Six(3), Sept(4), Huit(4), Neuf(4), Dix(3), Valet(5), Reine(5), Roi(3).
2 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 4 + 3 + 4 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 5 + 5 + 3 = 52 (Reine = Dame)

And German:As(2), zwo(3), drei(4), vier(4), fünf(4), sechs(5), sieben(6), acht(4), neun(4), zehn(4), Bub’(3), Dame(4), König(5).
2 + 3 + 4 + 4 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 52 (zwo = zwei, Bub’ = Bube) Don’t force it – use a bigger hammer :-)

The sum of the “people” (Jack, Queen, King) is always 13, in these three languages. It follows that the sum of the rest of the cards must be 39, because 52 = 13 * 4 (the four seasons again!)

Coincidence? Some of it? Part of it? All of it?

Posted in ideas, occult, tarot | 3 Comments

culture is not your friend

Posted in art, general, ideas | Comments Off

a new start

self portraitHello everyone!

This may come as a jolt, but a change was long overdue. New format, new look, new content (mostly), but still the same 23 degree brain. Hopefully more original thoughts, and fewer rabid screeds, but no promises.

Frankly, covering recent events from 2002-2009 in such detail was becoming psychologically exhausting. Now it’s clear why politicians are so dysfunctional. They should all be given a long, long holiday, for their own good.

The current site is using a simple, standard wordpress theme; it may be changed, time permitting, to something more meritorious.

Status update: the long-in-progress film about peak oil is still in progress, and will, hopefully, be done soonish. A New Year’s resolution to sharply reduce time spent on news/doom/eek is an ongoing project. Expect different posts, on different subject matters.

Here’s a quick video of a recent animation test:

Anyhow, more later!

Posted in general | 6 Comments